FIELD REPORT / 026 2026.05.11
75 years of engine programs vs T-minus 2.5
CASE STUDY · LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAMS

Two and a half years
to a working orbital engine.

On May 11, 2026, Cowboy Space Corporation announced a $275M Series B and a plan to build its own Falcon 9-class rocket — first flight before end of 2028. TechCrunch coverage here. That's roughly 30 months from public program start to a launch pad. Here's how every comparable engine program from 1957 to today actually played out.

Cowboy Space target
~2.5years to first launch
Median to stage 1 success
9years · 13 flown families
Fastest historical family
5years · small-lift only
Cowboy Space funding
$275MSeries B / $2B post
01 · DEV → STAGE 1 SUCCESS

How long it takes a new engine family to put its first stage through a successful burn — on an orbital-class launcher.

Measured at the engine-family level (Merlin 1A→1D as one family, Raptor 1→3 as one family, etc.) from program development start to the first time the engine family's first stage completed a successful burn on an orbital-class launch vehicle. This is a generous criterion — it credits programs where the engine did its job even if the upper stage or recovery failed. Sources are public-domain (Wikipedia, Astronautix, NASASpaceflight, company press) and cited in the dataset. NK-15 (N1) never achieved stage 1 success across 4 launches. NK-33/Antares is excluded from the visible timeline as a 45-year outlier (Soviet engine mothballed for decades before flying on Antares 100 in 2013).

Years from program start to first stage 1 burn success on orbital launcher
N=15 families flown · 2 pending · 1 never succeeded · scale: 0–16 years · 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 🇨🇳
Cowboy Space 2026 · USA
2.5y target to first launch
2.5TARGET
Merlin family 2002 · SpaceX · M1A→M1D
5y → F1-2 M1A stage 1 burn complete
5SUCCESS
TQ-12 family 2017 · LandSpace · TQ-12/12A 🇨🇳
5y → ZQ-2 maiden stage 1 burn complete
5SUCCESS
Rutherford 2013 · Rocket Lab
5y → Electron F2 stage 1 to orbit
5SUCCESS
Reaver 1 2017 · Firefly
5y → Alpha F2 stage 1 to partial orbit
5SUCCESS
RD-180 1994 · Energomash 🇷🇺 · RD-170 lineage
6y → Atlas IIIA maiden clean
6SUCCESS
Aeon 1 2017 · Relativity
6y → Terran 1 stage 1 complete
6SUCCESS
RD-170 1976 · Energomash 🇷🇺
9y → Zenit June 1985 stage 1 success
9SUCCESS
Astra Delphin 2012 · Ventions/Astra
9y → LV0007 stage 1 to orbit (6th try)
9SUCCESS
F-1 1957 · Rocketdyne
10y → Apollo 4 S-IC flawless
10SUCCESS
Raptor family 2012 · SpaceX · R1/R2/R3
12y → IFT-3 Super Heavy stage 1 complete
12SUCCESS
BE-4 2011 · Blue Origin
13y → Vulcan maiden clean
13SUCCESS
YF-100 2002 · CASC 🇨🇳
13y → LM-6 maiden clean
13SUCCESS
YF-77 2002 · CASC 🇨🇳
14y → LM-5 maiden clean
14SUCCESS
Aeon R 2021 · Relativity
5y dev so far → pending '26
5+PENDING
Zenith 2022 · Stoke Space
~4y dev so far → pending '26
4+PENDING
NK-15 (N1) 1965 · Kuznetsov 🇷🇺
7y → 4 launches all stage 1 fail
7NEVER
0y2y4y6y8y10y12y14y16y
02 · ATTEMPTS BEFORE STAGE 1 SUCCESS

Most programs need more than one shot. Cowboy Space has 30 months to find out.

Number of orbital-class flight attempts before the engine family completed a successful first-stage burn. Across 75 years and 4 nations, of 14 flown families: 7 got their stage 1 right on the first try, 6 needed between one and five additional attempts, and NK-15 never completed a stage 1 burn across 4 N1 launches before the program was canceled. Astra's Delphin engine family needed six total launches before reaching orbit on LV0007 (Nov 2021). NK-33 sat mothballed for 25 years before flying on Antares — a 45-year dev cycle.

Orbital-class flight attempts before first stage 1 burn success
Engine family · public flight record
NK-15: 4 attempts, never succeeded. Delphin: 5 failures → LV0007. Raptor: 2 → IFT-3. RD-170: 1 → Zenit June 1985. Rutherford: 1 → Electron F2. Reaver 1: 1 → Alpha F2. Merlin: 1 → F1-2. Clean debuts: F-1, Aeon 1, TQ-12, RD-180, BE-4, YF-100, YF-77.
03 · WHAT THE DATA SUGGESTS

Four honest reads of the timeline.

Not predictions — just the pattern in the data.

FINDING / 01

2.5 years to a new orbital engine has zero historical precedent.

Across 15 historical engine families spanning 75 years, the median time from program start to first stage 1 burn success on an orbital-class launcher is ~9 years. The fastest historical family was 5 years — Merlin, TQ-12, Rutherford, and Reaver 1 all tied at that mark, and all are small-lift engines (≤1 MN sea-level thrust per engine). Every clean-sheet engine large enough to power a Falcon 9-sized vehicle has taken 9–14 years to reach stage 1 success (RD-170: 9y, Raptor family: 12y, BE-4: 13y, YF-100: 13y, YF-77: 14y). No clean-sheet program, of any thrust class, has hit stage 1 success in under 5 years.

FINDING / 02

First flights fail. Plan for it.

Of 14 engine families that have flown an orbital-class vehicle, 7 cleared stage 1 burn success on their first attempt: F-1, RD-180, BE-4, YF-100, YF-77, TQ-12, and Aeon 1. The other 6 needed between one and five additional attempts. Astra's Delphin needed 6 total launches before stage 1 succeeded. NK-15 never completed a stage 1 burn across 4 N1 launches — the program was canceled. The clean-debut families were all backed by national programs (F-1, RD-180 via RD-170, BE-4 via ULA, YF-100/77) or derisked extensively on test stands (TQ-12, Aeon 1). A first launch by end-2028 is not the same as a successful orbital mission.

FINDING / 03

$275M is light for a clean-sheet orbital rocket program.

SpaceX took ~$390M of NASA COTS (plus equivalent private capital) to get Falcon 9 v1.0 to flight. Relativity has raised ~$1.3B and still hasn't flown Terran R. Stoke is at $1.34B and hasn't flown Nova. Cowboy Space's $275M is roughly one funding round below the historical "first flight" capital floor for a vehicle this size — and the rocket is only the cost-side; data-center sats add 9-figures more.

FINDING / 04

Vertical integration of the payload is the bet.

The unusual structural move is building the data center into the second stage — a callback to Explorer 1 (1958) where the final stage was the satellite. This eliminates payload integration friction and the bus mass budget, but it also means every launch carries irreplaceable compute hardware. Net: the engine program is fast-tracked, but the payload risk profile is unforgiving. One bad day on the pad costs ~$50M+ of GPUs.

04 · ENGINE SPECIFICATIONS

The full dataset.

Every engine program referenced above, with sea-level thrust, propellant, cycle, and program economics. Numbers rounded; cost estimates derived from public disclosures and known contracts.

Engine Company Propellant Cycle Thrust SL (kN) Isp SL (s) Pc (bar) Per stage First flight Years dev Outcome Unit cost (est.)
F-1 🇺🇸RocketdyneLOX/RP-1Gas gen 6,770263705 196710 SuccessGovt program
NK-15 🇷🇺KuznetsovLOX/RP-1Ox-rich SC 1,50529714830 19694 4× FailGovt program
RD-170 🇷🇺NPO EnergomashLOX/RP-1Ox-rich SC 7,2503092454 (Energia) 19879 SuccessGovt program
RD-180 🇷🇺NPO EnergomashLOX/RP-1Ox-rich SC 3,8303112671 (Atlas V) 20006 Success$11–25M
YF-100 🇨🇳CASC / Xi'anLOX/RP-1Ox-rich SC 1,2003001801–6 (varies) 2015 (LM-6)13 SuccessGovt program
YF-77 🇨🇳CASC / BeijingLOX/LH₂Gas gen 518 (×2)3171012 (LM-5 core) 201614 SuccessGovt program
TQ-12 🇨🇳LandSpaceLOX/CH₄Gas gen 6582851014 (ZQ-2) 20225 Stage 1 ✓ ZQ-2 maidenUnknown
TQ-12A 🇨🇳LandSpaceLOX/CH₄Gas gen 800~290~1059 (ZQ-3) 20253 Stage 1 ✓ · land ✗Unknown
Merlin 1ASpaceXLOX/RP-1Gas gen 340255~601 20064 Stage 1 ✓ F1-2N/A
Merlin 1CSpaceXLOX/RP-1Gas gen 556275679 (F9 v1.0) 20104 Success~$1M
Merlin 1DSpaceXLOX/RP-1Gas gen 845282979 20132 Success~$1–2M
Raptor 1SpaceXLOX/CH₄FFSC 1,81032733033 (SH) 2019 (Hopper)7 Success~$1M target
Raptor 2SpaceXLOX/CH₄FFSC 2,26032733033 (SH) 2023 (IFT-1)4 Stage 1 ✓ IFT-3Unknown
Raptor 3SpaceXLOX/CH₄FFSC 2,750~32733033+ 2026 (planned)3 PendingUnknown
BE-4Blue OriginLOX/CH₄Ox-rich SC 2,460~3401402 / 7 202413 Success~$8–10M
RutherfordRocket LabLOX/RP-1Electric pump 24311N/A9 20174 Stage 1 ✓ F2 '18~$250K
DelphinAstra/VentionsLOX/RP-1Electric pump 29N/AN/A5 20189 Stage 1 ✓ LV0007 '21Unknown
Reaver 1FireflyLOX/RP-1Tap-off 184~280N/A4 20214 Stage 1 ✓ F2 '22Unknown
Aeon 1RelativityLOX/CH₄Gas gen (3DP) 100N/AN/A9 20236 Stage 1 ✓ · retiredUnknown
Aeon RRelativityLOX/CH₄Gas gen (high-P) 1,150N/AN/A13 2026 (planned)5 PendingUnknown
ZenithStoke SpaceLOX/CH₄FFSC 440N/AN/A7 2026 (planned)~4 PendingUnknown
Cowboy Space (TBD)Cowboy SpaceTBDTBD ~8–10 MN totalTBDTBDTBD 2028 target2.5 Announced$275M S-B